Tag: Liquid Fission

  • The Explosion of Energy Demand for AI

    The Explosion of Energy Demand for AI

    Artificial intelligence is often discussed as a software revolution. Physically, however, it is an electricity-and-infrastructure revolution. Every AI response requires computation in data centres, and increasingly capable systems require more memory, more processors, longer operating times, and more internal reasoning.

    The central question is not whether one AI query uses a lot of energy. Most individual queries use very little. The question is whether billions of queries, autonomous agents, AI-generated media, robotics, scientific simulations, and industrial systems will operate continuously.

    The answer could reshape global energy demand.

    Two Useful Comparison Figures

    Humanity currently consumes approximately 25 EJ per year in food energy. That is the energy metabolized by human bodies.

    The world’s total energy consumption is approximately 600 EJ per year. This includes transport, buildings, industry, agriculture, electricity generation, and fuel use.

    These give us two useful benchmarks:

    • 25 EJ: the energy consumed by all human bodies
    • 600 EJ: the energy consumed by human civilisation

    AI is nowhere near either benchmark today, but its growth rate is much faster than the growth rate of human population or conventional energy demand.

    The Central AI Energy Estimate

    A reasonable middle estimate for AI energy consumption is:

    These figures include the operational energy of AI servers and associated data-centre infrastructure. They should be understood as a central model rather than as precise measurements. Companies generally report total data-centre consumption rather than separating artificial intelligence from ordinary cloud computing, storage, and networking.

    The 2030 estimate is consistent with projections showing that data-centre electricity demand will rise rapidly as AI-accelerated servers become the main source of growth.

    From a Niche Technology to a Major Energy Load

    In 2020, AI consumed approximately 0.06 EJ annually. At that point, large-scale machine learning was important, but AI systems were used mainly for recommendation engines, search, advertising, translation, image recognition, and early language models.

    By 2026, AI energy consumption may be around 0.8 EJ annually. That is still small compared with total human energy use:

    0.8 / 25 = 3.5%

    AI would therefore consume only about 3% of the energy contained in human food consumption, and about:

    0.8 / 600 = 0.13%

    of our civilisation’s total energy consumption.

    The significance is not its present share. The significance is the growth rate and the possibility that AI computation becomes embedded in nearly every digital and industrial process.

    2030: AI Becomes a Substantial Industrial Load

    By 2030, a central estimate of 2.5 EJ per year would place AI at:

    2.5 / 25 = 10%

    of human food energy, and:

    2.5% / 600 = 0.42%

    of total civilisation energy use.

    At this stage, AI would still be a small fraction of global energy consumption, but it would be large enough to influence national electricity planning, data-centre construction, semiconductor manufacturing, transmission networks, and power-plant investment.

    The energy would not be used only for chatbots. Major sources of demand would include:

    • training increasingly large models;
    • serving billions of daily interactions;
    • internal reasoning and planning;
    • autonomous software agents;
    • video and three-dimensional content generation;
    • scientific and engineering simulations;
    • industrial control systems;
    • robotics and autonomous vehicles.

    The most important change is that AI systems may perform computation continuously, rather than only when a human is actively using a computer.

    2050: AI Approaches the Energy of Human Metabolism

    A central 2050 estimate of 18 EJ per year would make AI’s energy consumption approximately:

    18 / 25 = 72%

    of the energy consumed by all human bodies.

    This does not mean AI would be as intelligent as humanity, nor that it would replace all human mental activity. It means that the machines performing AI computation could consume energy on a scale comparable with the food energy sustaining the human population.

    Relative to civilisation’s total energy use:

    18 / 600 = 3% (ignoring the growth of the 600 EJ number)

    Even at 18 EJ, AI would remain only about 3% of current global energy consumption. AI could approach the energy scale of human metabolism while remaining far below the energy scale of civilisation.

    Why Energy per Task is Not Enough

    AI hardware is becoming more efficient. The amount of computation delivered per unit of energy will continue to improve through:

    • smaller and more specialised models;
    • quantisation and lower-precision arithmetic;
    • better memory systems;
    • improved cooling;
    • more efficient chips;
    • model sparsity;
    • speculative decoding;
    • better software and scheduling.

    However, efficiency improvements do not necessarily reduce total energy consumption. When computation becomes cheaper, people and companies often use more of it.

    A simple text request may require modest computation. An autonomous agent may perform hundreds of internal steps. A video model, scientific simulator, or robot may require vastly more computation than a short text response.

    The central relationship is:

    Total AI energy = number of tasks × energy per task

    If energy per task falls by ten times while the number of tasks rises by one hundred times, total energy demand rises tenfold.

    AI Will Not Necessarily Surpass Civilisation’s Energy Use

    To exceed the energy consumption of civilization, AI would need to reach:

    600 EJ per year (today’s annual demand)

    That is approximately 33 times the central 2050 estimate of 18 EJ.

    Such a future is possible only if the definition of AI expands well beyond data centres. It would likely require AI to control or perform a large share of:

    • robotics;
    • transportation;
    • manufacturing;
    • mining;
    • construction;
    • agriculture;
    • energy production;
    • synthetic biology;
    • industrial simulation;
    • machine-to-machine economic activity.

    In other words, AI would need to become not merely a digital service but a major operating layer for the physical economy.

    Do you think it will?

    The Strategic Implication

    The central forecast is not that AI will immediately consume more energy than humanity. It is unlikely.

    The most likely trajectory is:

    • 2020: AI is energetically insignificant at global scale.
    • 2026: AI is approaching 1 EJ per year and becoming visible in electricity demand.
    • 2030: AI reaches several EJ per year and becomes a major infrastructure sector.
    • 2050: AI could consume energy comparable with a substantial fraction of human food metabolism.
    • Beyond 2050: AI could become one of the largest categories of energy demand if autonomous systems, robotics, and machine-controlled industry expand dramatically.

    The decisive issue is not whether AI is efficient in isolation. The decisive issue is whether efficiency gains are overwhelmed by the scale of deployment.

    Human bodies consume approximately 25 EJ per year in food. Human civilisation consumes approximately 600 EJ per year in total. A central AI trajectory from 0.06 EJ in 2020 to 18 EJ in 2050 would not yet overtake civilisation, but it would transform AI from a software category into a major energy-consuming industry.

    The AI revolution may ultimately be measured not only in models, parameters, or tokens, but in exajoules.

    Post Script – How Much is 1 EJ

    One 1 GW power station—of any type—operating continuously for a year produces approximately 0.032 EJ of energy. Supplying 1 EJ per year requires approximately 32 one-gigawatt power stations—or roughly 35–40 stations after allowing for maintenance and downtime.

    That scale is well suited to a fleet of liquid-fission thorium burners: compact, continuously operating reactors deployed near the data centres and industrial facilities that need dependable, high-density power.

    Baby AI being fed from Thorium by The Thorium Network

  • China Is Building the Nuclear Future

    China Is Building the Nuclear Future

    Famous climate researcher and speaker Bjorn Lomborg made a good point recently: China remains a fossil-fuel-powered industrial economy, just as the rest of the world does. But that is only half the story.

    China Moving Off Fossil Fuels with The Thorium Network

    The equally important story is the speed at which China is adding nuclear capacity and positioning itself across the entire advanced-nuclear technology landscape.

    China is not merely building conventional reactors. It is developing a broad portfolio that includes:

    – Hualong One and CAP-series pressurised-water reactors

    – High-temperature gas-cooled reactors

    – Sodium-cooled fast reactors

    – Liquid Fission Burners (aka Molten-salt reactors)

    – Thorium-fuel-cycle research

    – Closed-fuel-cycle and reprocessing technologies

    – Nuclear heat, industrial steam, hydrogen, and other non-electric applications

    China’s conventional nuclear fleet has expanded dramatically. By early 2026, China was operating approximately 58 reactors with about 56 GW of installed capacity, while more than 30 additional reactors were under construction. China has also approved ten or more new reactors annually for several consecutive years.

    This is not a theoretical program. In December 2023, China’s HTR-PM at Shidao Bay entered commercial operation. It is a high-temperature gas-cooled, pebble-bed reactor generally classified as a Generation IV system. The plant combines two reactor modules with one turbine and is designed to provide both electricity and high-temperature process heat. Follow-up work has included district heating and industrial-steam applications.

    China is also advancing sodium-cooled fast reactors. The CFR-600 project at Xiapu represents a major step toward fast-spectrum reactors and a potential closed fuel cycle. The CFR-600 is promising whilst still at demonstration-stage technology. Its initial fuel supply has involved Russian fast breeder expert cooperation.

    In the Liquid Fission Thorium Burner space is China’s TMSR-LF1 at Wuwei in Gansu Province.

    This is a 2-MW-thermal Liquid Fission experimental burner developed by the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics. It achieved first criticality on October 11, 2023, and reached full power in June 2024. In October 2024, Thorium was added to the operating liquid fuel. In November 2025, the Chinese research team announced that it had obtained experimental evidence of Thorium-to-uranium conversion inside the reactor. How many units do they have now, they are not saying.

    China’s next stated step is a 100-MW-thermal demonstration project, with demonstration applications targeted for 2035 and commercialisation by 2040. Expect China to shorten those timelines dramatically. China appears to be the only country currently operating a Liquid Fission molten-salt burner that has incorporated Thorium and reported Thorium-to-uranium conversion success.

    This is why Jeremiah Josey’s September 2023 presentation at the CLSA/CITIC Securities investors forum in Hong Kong was so prescient. Speaking to a large Chinese investment audience, he argued that China’s nuclear opportunity extended beyond the construction of today’s pressurised-water reactors. The presentation placed China’s reactor buildout, advanced nuclear research, fuel-cycle strategy, and Liquid Fission Thorium development within one investment and industrial framework. The event materials describe an audience of approximately 1,600 investors and featured the thesis that China was moving from imported and conventional designs toward technological self-reliance and advanced reactor systems.

    You can see the the full presentation here:

    The comparison with France is also important. China is not the first nation to demonstrate that a large nuclear buildout can transform an electricity system. France carried out its own exceptionally rapid nuclear expansion during the 1970s and 1980s, weaning it’s self entirely off fossil fuels.

    Fossil fuel to France is what wind and solar are to everyone else: a fringe power supply.

    The French example proves that a country can replace a large share of fossil electricity within a decade when nuclear construction is treated as a national infrastructure program.

    France goes nuclear and comes off fossil fuels The Thorium Network

    China is now pursuing that same basic logic on a much larger industrial scale—but with a broader technology portfolio. France standardised around pressurised-water reactors – their own incredible safe design.

    China is building—also their own desgin—pressurised-water reactors at scale while also developing high-temperature gas reactors, fast reactors, molten-salt systems, and Thorium-cycle technologies.

    The conclusion is that China has created the world’s most serious national test bed for nuclear scale-up. And they are doing it in earnest.

    China is simultaneously:

    1. Building conventional nuclear reactors faster than any other major country.

    2. Operating the first commercial Generation IV reactor.

    3. Developing fast reactors and fuel-cycle infrastructure.

    4. Operating Liquid Fission machines.

    5. Re-proving the conversion of Thorium into uranium-233.

    6. Planning larger demonstrations for industrial heat, hydrogen, and electricity.

    7. Combining state financing, domestic manufacturing, centralized planning, and a very large internal energy market.

    China may still burn enormous quantities of coal, oil, and gas today. That does not make its nuclear strategy irrelevant. It makes the strategy more important. China’s immense energy demand is precisely why it is pursuing every scalable source of reliable power—including coal, renewables, hydro, nuclear, and advanced nuclear technologies.

    The investment and technological question is therefore not whether China is already “green.”

    It is whether China’s combination of nuclear construction speed, industrial capacity, advanced-reactor research, and long-term energy demand will allow it to become the first country to commercialize a new generation of nuclear systems at meaningful scale.

    That is the question Jeremiah Josey put before Chinese investors in Hong Kong in 2023. The subsequent progress of HTR-PM and TMSR-LF1 clearly demonstrate that the question was not misplaced.

    We think it’s a moot point.

    Read the full 2023 post on our website

    Read Bjorn’s post