Category: Australia

  • The Chinese Thorium Programme: Building a New Fission Industry

    The Chinese Thorium Programme: Building a New Fission Industry

    By Jeremiah Josey 7 October 2026

    China is turning Thorium from a geological resource into an industrial and engineering programme—and energy for their future. Their researchers have built and operated the world’s first Thorium-loaded Liquid Fission machine, demonstrated Thorium-to-uranium conversion inside an operating system, developed domestic alloys for high-temperature molten-salt service and is in advanced planning for larger demonstration projects.

    This is a major advance in Fission technology. It brings together work that is often discussed separately—fuel, reactors, materials, mining and manufacturing—into a national programme with a clear direction: use Chinese science and industry to develop a new generation of Liquid Fission Thorium Burners—for China. China does not intend to export this technology, particularly to the West.

    China’s achievement is much more than this single machine in the desert. It is an industrial pathway: from laboratory research, to a working experimental reactor, to demonstration-scale systems, supported by domestic resources and supply chains. And it started decades ago when China first went into rare earth production—because that’s where the Thorium comes from.

    From research programme to operating reactor

    China’s Thorium Molten Salt Reactor programme began publicly in 2011 under the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its principal research organisation is the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, or SINAP. The programme has developed reactor designs, fuel-salt expertise, materials, components and the specialist facilities needed to test them.

    The flagship experimental system is TMSR-LF1, located near Wuwei in Gansu Province. It is a 2-megawatt-thermal (MWt) liquid-fuel molten-salt machine. It achieved first criticality on 11 October 2023, reached full power in June 2024, and operated with Thorium fuel after Thorium was added in October 2024. In November 2025, Chinese researchers announced the first successful Thorium-to-uranium conversion in an operating molten-salt reactor. This is the first time on Earth that this has happened. Even at Oak Ridge, they processed the Thorium at Savannah River, several hundred miles away—and spent millions of dollars—to make it suitable for fuel at Oak Ridge. China has now just “popped” it in, and it’s working fine, just as the physics says it should.

    These are concrete engineering milestones. TMSR-LF1 has moved the Thorium fuel cycle from calculations and laboratory experiments into a working reactor environment. Chinese researchers have been able to examine fuel salt, operate the system at power and collect experimental data from Thorium loaded into the reactor. The achievement gives China an important platform for developing the next stages of its programme.

    [world-nuclear-news.org]

    The burner uses an initial fissile fuel to sustain fission. Just as the Canadians apply a similar principle to U-238 in their CANDU machines.Thorium-232 is fertile: after absorbing a neutron, it transforms through intermediate steps into uranium-233, which burns in the reactor. The Thorium-to-uranium conversion demonstrated at TMSR-LF1 is therefore a major milestone in the fuel cycle, as well as in machine operation.

    TMSR-LF1 is a research and technology platform. Its purpose is to prove and study the processes needed for larger systems. It has already done that job at a significant level: it is operating, it has incorporated Thorium and its team has reported conversion data from the Thorium-uranium cycle.

    The next stage: larger demonstration systems

    SINAP has stated that its next goal is a 100-MWt Thorium molten-salt demonstration project, with demonstration applications targeted by 2035. This is a major planned step up from the 2-MWt experimental reactor. It is intended to carry the programme forward from experimental operation towards larger-scale engineering and industrial use.

    Remember, in 1969 at Oak Ridge, once they completed testing their ~8 MW machine—just as China has done now—by 1972 they had designed a 1,000 MWe full-scale commercial machine. They were ready to scale immediately.

    Earlier project reporting also described a proposed 60-MWt system designed to produce 10 megawatts of electricity, with a target around 2030. These figures refer to different reported project plans and stages in the development pathway. The central point is that China is moving from a small experimental machine towards larger systems designed to demonstrate practical energy applications.

    [IEEE]

    The potential uses extend beyond electricity. High-temperature Liquid Fission systems can provide industrial heat, process steam and heat for hydrogen production and other applications. Their high operating temperatures also make them relevant to energy-intensive industries that currently rely on large quantities of fossil-fuel heat. China has identified integration with chemical production, energy storage, hydrogen and other industrial processes as part of the wider TMSR vision.

    [cas.cn]

    Development stageChinese programme milestone
    Research and designThorium Liquid Fission programme launched in 2011
    Experimental machineTMSR-LF1 reached first criticality in October 2023
    Full-power operationTMSR-LF1 reached 2-MWt full power in June 2024
    Thorium operationThorium was added to the burner in October 2024
    Fuel-cycle progressThorium-to-uranium conversion announced in November 2025
    Demonstration pathwaySINAP has set a 100-MWt demonstration goal for 2035

    Liquid Fission Thorium Burners are important

    A Liquid Fission Thorium Burner uses molten salt as the reactor’s working fluid. In a liquid-fuel design, Fission fuel is dissolved in the salt, which circulates through the reactor system and carries heat to the next stage of the plant.

    That arrangement offers a different engineering pathway from conventional solid-fuel reactors. Liquid-fuel systems can be designed for continuous fuel management—that means total fuel burn up, high-temperature heat production and operation at comparatively low pressure. These features open up possibilities for power generation and industrial heat, including applications in inland regions where there is little water. Liquid Fission Thorium Burners do not need any water.

    China’s programme is developing the machine and fuel-cycle technology together. The operating TMSR-LF1 provides a place to test real fuel salt, materials and operating procedures as an integrated system. Its results can inform the larger demonstration projects now being pursued.

    China’s Thorium resources: turning mine waste into an asset

    China’s resource position gives the programme an additional strategic dimension. Thorium occurs in rare-earth-bearing minerals, including monazite, and can be found in material produced during mining and processing. This means that the country’s established rare-earth industry also provides a long-term Thorium resource.

    The most prominent example is Bayan Obo, in Inner Mongolia. Bayan Obo is a major rare-earth, iron and niobium district, and Thorium is present in some of its ores and minerals. Measured quantities of Thorium give an estimated 10,000 years of energy supply from that deposit alone. For decades, mining there has focused on the resources with immediate commercial value. The Thorium associated with the deposit and its waste streams has drawn renewed attention as China develops a practical route for using Thorium in Fission systems.

    A national geological survey completed in 2020 identified 233 Thorium-rich regions across China. Reporting on the survey highlighted the potential of Thorium-bearing tailings at Bayan Obo and described an estimate of up to one million tonnes associated with the mining complex. China has ample local energy reserves.

    A 2025 [study] of Bayan Obo examined how Thorium occurs across the deposit.

    [ScienceDirect]

    This is a compelling industrial proposition: a material treated as a by-product or residue becoming a feedstock for advanced Fission systems. As China develops its Liquid Fission Thorium Burner technology, the value of characterising and recovering Thorium from its mining and processing streams rises with it.

    Geological resources, stored material and usable fuel

    China’s “Thorium stockpile” refers to several different things: Thorium-bearing ore in the ground, Thorium in mine tailings, monazite concentrates, separated Thorium compounds or material prepared to a reactor’s fuel specifications. These categories describe different points in the supply chain.

    China’s large resource estimates point to the scale of its geological opportunity. The operational reactor programme provides the technology pathway that make those resources useful. Over time, development of separation, conversion and fuel-manufacturing capabilities could connect resource assessments to a domestic fuel supply.

    China is combining a large domestic resource potential, decades of rare-earth mining and a programme now demonstrating Thorium conversion in an operating machine.

    India and 10,000-tonnes for China

    India has substantial Thorium-bearing mineral resources, mainly in monazite-rich coastal sands, and has pursued the development of a Thorium fuel cycle for decades. Between roughly 2002 and 2012, China obtained 10,000 tonnes of Thorium from India, further boosting its reserves.

    Rare earths: a long-running connection to Thorium

    Thorium and rare-earth production are connected through geology. Most rare-earth ores contain Thorium, and processing them creates Thorium-bearing concentrates. China’s rare-earth industry has operated at scale for decades, generating extensive experience in mining, mineral separation and chemical processing.

    This history gives China a valuable industrial base for investigating how Thorium can be recovered from existing mineral streams. It also means that resource assessment can draw on a large, established mining sector rather than starting from scratch with isolated Thorium mines.

    The next opportunity is to connect those capabilities more directly to the Chinese Thorium programme: characterise the Thorium-bearing material, develop efficient recovery and refining processes, and build a domestic route from mineral resource to reactor fuel. The more fully this supply chain develops, the more closely China’s rare-earth strengths and advanced Fission programme can reinforce one another.

    GH3535: China’s alloy for molten-salt service

    A Liquid Fission Thorium Burner depends on materials that can operate for long periods at high temperatures while in contact with molten salts. The reactor’s alloy must retain strength and perform reliably in its intended service. Developing such materials is a core part of building the technology.

    The historic reference material for molten fluoride salt systems is Hastelloy N, developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. China’s answer is GH3535, similar to Hastelloy, a nickel-molybdenum-chromium alloy developed for molten-salt reactor applications.

    GH3535 was co-developed by the Institute of Metal Research (IMR) and SINAP of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and is produced in China by Fushun Special Steel. It is the Chinese programme’s domestic counterpart to Hastelloy N: an alloy designed for the same broad class of high-temperature molten-fluoride service and integrated into China’s own reactor development and manufacturing base.

    This matters strategically as well as technically. A domestic alloy gives China a materials platform that can be manufactured, tested and improved within its own industrial system. It supports the development of reactor components without relying on a foreign alloy supply chain and allows the research programme to tailor materials work to its own reactor designs.

    SINAP, UNSW and ANSTO collaboration

    The international research collaboration involved SINAP, the University of New South Wales (UNSW) and ANSTO. ANSTO is the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation. The Chinese partner was SINAP.

    The collaboration investigated how GH3535 and its welds respond to molten-salt exposure. Researchers examined the alloy’s microstructure and corrosion behaviour after exposure to fluoride salt at high temperature. ANSTO contributed specialist materials research and characterisation, helping the team understand how features such as grain structure and welding influence corrosion performance.

    [ansto.gov.au]

    That work adds to the engineering foundation of China’s programme. Reactor materials are evaluated as manufactured and welded components operating in salt under demanding conditions. The SINAP–UNSW–ANSTO collaboration produced knowledge in precisely this area.

    GH3535 therefore is part of China’s effort to establish its own molten-salt materials capability: alloy development, industrial production, welding knowledge and international research on performance. Together, these capabilities support China’s ability to design and build Liquid Fission Thorium Burner systems around a domestic technology and manufacturing base.

    A national supply chain, not just a burner

    China’s TMSR programme draws strength from the way its pieces fit together. SINAP leads research and reactor development. Chinese institutions and manufacturers contribute equipment and materials. Rare-earth mining offers a substantial potential Thorium resource. Domestic alloy production supports reactor construction. Experimental operation supplies a platform for learning and improvement.

    That integration is one of the programme’s defining features. A successful advanced Fission industry needs more than a working reactor design. It needs people trained to operate it, qualified materials, chemical-processing expertise, fuel production, testing facilities and industrial partners capable of producing components at scale.

    China has stated that the Thorium programme has established a largely domestic technology and industrial chain, and that it intends to work with energy companies to advance engineering application. Its experience operating TMSR-LF1 gives those partners a real technical platform around which to build.

    [cas.cn]

    What China’s progress means

    China has established itself as the first country to operate a molten-salt reactor loaded with Thorium and report successful Thorium-to-uranium conversion in that system. It has a rapidly growing body of practical operating experience, a domestic alloy designed for molten-salt service, a large rare-earth industry and plans to get bigger.

    The importance of the programme lies in the combination:

    • Burner operation: TMSR-LF1 has reached full power and operated with Thorium.
    • Fuel-cycle progress: Researchers have reported Thorium-to-uranium conversion in an operating system.
    • Materials capability: China has developed and manufactures GH3535 for molten-salt applications.
    • Resource potential: Thorium occurs in domestic deposits and in material associated with rare-earth mining.
    • Industrial direction: China is targeting larger demonstration systems and applications beyond electricity.

    Each achievement strengthens the next. Reactor operation creates experience. Fuel-cycle research builds on that operation. Materials research supports longer and larger runs. Resource and manufacturing capabilities provide the basis for an industrial supply chain.

    China’s Thorium programme is a serious national effort to build a new Fission technology from the ground up. The country has moved from a research commitment in 2011 to an operating Thorium-loaded experimental reactor, published conversion results and a stated pathway towards larger demonstration systems. That is a substantial achievement—and a strong foundation for the next phase of Liquid Fission Thorium Burner development.

    Chinese Gobi Desert Molten Salt Industrial Facility
    Gobi Desert Molten Salt Installation

    More from The Thorium Network on China

    Reports on China’s Thorium Program

    The following is a selection of informative reports we’ve gathered on China’s Thorium program. It is not exhaustive, but it offers an overview of what is widely regarded as the world’s most advanced, best-staffed, and best-funded Thorium program.

    Links and references relevant to China’s Thorium programme

    1. Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (SINAP) — China’s lead research institute for the TMSR programme.
      https://english.sinap.cas.cn/
    2. China’s first Thorium-to-uranium conversion announcement — Science and Technology Daily reports the 2025 milestone, the Gansu experimental reactor and the programme’s 2035 demonstration target. (Chinese)
      https://www.stdaily.com/web/gdxw/2025-11/01/content\_424807.html
    3. Chinese Academy of Sciences coverage of the conversion milestone — Xinhua’s report on the TMSR-LF1 result and China’s Thorium research programme. (Chinese)
      https://www.cas.cn/cm/202511/t20251103\_5087046.shtml
    4. 2026 report on the Thorium-to-uranium result — Xinhua coverage of the achievement’s selection among China’s 2025 top scientific advances. (Chinese)
      https://finance.sina.cn/stock/jdts/2026-03-28/detail-inhspwhs1104481.d.html
    5. Development of GH3535 Alloy for the Thorium Molten Salt Reactor — Research paper on the Chinese alloy used in the programme’s molten-salt materials development.
      https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324580866\_Development\_of\_GH3535\_Alloy\_for\_Thorium\_Molten\_Salt\_Reactor
    6. Mark Ho presentation hosted by Nuclear Australia — Background on China’s Thorium molten-salt reactor development.
      https://www.nuclearaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Mark\_Ho\_20210512.pdf
    7. “Research Progress of TMSR Design” — Yang Zou’s 2019 presentation on China’s TMSR design work.
      http://samofar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-TMSR-SAMOFAR%E2%80%94%E2%80%94Yang-ZOU-PDF-version-1.pdf
    8. “Progress of TMSR in China” — Hongjie Xu’s 2018 programme presentation.
      https://threeconsulting.com/mt-content/uploads/2021/04/chinatmsr2018.pdf
    9. China’s TMSR research presentation to the Generation IV International Forum — Overview of the Chinese programme and its technical direction.
      https://www.gen-4.org/gif/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-05/03\_hongjie\_xu\_china.pdf
    10. “Update on SINAP TMSR Research” — Research update presented at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory molten-salt reactor workshop.
      https://msrworkshop.ornl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/MSR2016-day1-15-Hongjie-Xu-Update-on-SINAP-TMSR-Research.pdf
    11. “Sensitivity/uncertainty comparison and similarity analysis between TMSR-LF1 and MSR models” — Technical study of the Chinese experimental reactor’s modelling and design validation.
      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149197020300482?via%3Dihub
    12. “Burnup optimization of once-through molten salt reactors using enriched uranium and Thorium” — Research on Thorium fuel-cycle performance in molten-salt reactor models.
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41365-022-00995-2
    13. TMSR-LF1 seismic analysis — Engineering study of the experimental reactor’s plant structure.
      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1672269
    14. China moves closer to completion of the world’s first Thorium reactor — 2021 background on the experimental reactor’s construction plans; useful as historical context. ans.org
      https://www.ans.org/news/article-3091/china-moves-closer-to-completion-of-worlds-first-thorium-reactor/

  • The High Price of Keeping Nuclear Fission Energy Suppressed: How Fossil Fuels Bankroll Fear and Regulation

    The High Price of Keeping Nuclear Fission Energy Suppressed: How Fossil Fuels Bankroll Fear and Regulation

    Author Jeremiah Josey, 4 September 2025

    In 1969, the United States was surging ahead with nuclear fission power, flipping the switch on three new reactors a year to electrify millions of homes. Fission energy promised a cheap, reliable, and clean source of power, with a footprint as small as a few Central Parks combined. Fast forward to 2025, and fission energy, though still one of the safest and cleanest energy sources, has been largely sidelined. Why?

    The quiet, complex answer to this question lies in the billions—actually, trillions—of dollars the fossil fuel industry spends each year to keep fission energy suppressed. This strategic campaign to protect fossil fuel market share is a story woven through decades of fear-mongering, onerous regulations, and orchestrated myths largely funded by fossil fuel interests and their allies, including influential institutions such as the Rockefeller Institute.

    A Global Campaign Against Fission Power

    Fission energy’s limitations have less to do with safety or technology and more to do with economics and political influence. Fossil fuel companies, aware of nuclear power’s potential to disrupt their dominance, have poured immense resources into shaping public opinion and regulatory environments. For example, in Germany, a country known for its green-energy ambitions but also high industrial energy costs, the government publicly spent approximately 690 million euros in 2021 campaigning against cheaper French nuclear energy. The result? German industries, like its carmakers, suffered from higher energy prices, making them less competitive than their French counterparts powered predominantly by nuclear electricity.

    This is just one part of a global pattern. Various studies and reports highlight how fossil fuel subsidies, lobbying, and marketing have weakened fission power ambitions across continents. In Australia, for example, government fossil fuel subsidies reached USD 14.9 billion in 2024–25, fuelling coal, gas, and oil production, while nuclear options remain politically marginalised despite its obvious and logical potential as a clean energy pillar.

    Fossil Fuel Spending on Energy Suppression in 2025

    Globally, fossil fuel subsidies and related expenditures to bolster oil, natural gas, and coal industries continue to rise. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that in 2025, governments and private interests worldwide will spend billions annually—estimated at over USD 1 trillion—on fossil fuel support measures including subsidies, tax breaks, and lobbying efforts aimed at maintaining the status quo. They are using public funds – your tax money – to keep their merry-go-round going around.

    This vast pool of money not only props up fossil fuel extraction but also backs anti-nuclear campaigns, strict regulatory frameworks, and misinformation campaigns that cascade into project delays and cost inflation for nuclear projects. These tactics increase the construction time of nuclear plants from a few years to sometimes decades, exponentially raising capital and interest costs—effectively pricing nuclear out of competitive viability.

    The Rockefeller Institute and the Fossil Fuel Nexus

    One of the key orchestrators in this suppression strategy has been the Rockefeller Institute and its multifaceted network of foundations and organisations. Historically vested in fossil fuels—mainly oil—the Rockefeller interests have wielded significant influence to sway energy policy, often under the guise of environmental concern.

    Their involvement is evident in the proliferation of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) radiation model, which posits that any amount of radiation exposure increases cancer risk. While later findings have disproved the scientific basis of LNT, its implementation led to stringent safety regulations that made nuclear plant construction prohibitively expensive. This regulatory labyrinth was a boon to the fossil fuel sector who benefited—as they intended—from delaying nuclear advancements.

    The Economic Scale of Suppression: An Expensive Trade-off

    The economic numbers reveal a staggering cost—not just in dollars but in lost opportunity for clean and abundant power. According to U.S. Congressional Budget Office estimates, each month of delay in constructing a nuclear plant can cost about USD 44 million, plus USD 20 million in lost potential revenue. Over decades, the compounded cost of these delays, driven largely by unnecessary regulation and public fear campaigns, has ballooned nuclear construction costs tenfold.

    Meanwhile, fossil fuel industries continue to thrive on government support totalling hundreds of billions a year. The contrast is stark: in Australia alone, fossil fuel subsidies outstrip disaster readiness funds by 14 times, underscoring priorities tilted heavily toward maintaining fossil fuel dominance rather than investing in clean alternatives like nuclear.

    What This Means for Clean Energy’s Future

    Despite these barriers, there’s a renewed interest and slow resurgence in Fission technology, particularly in innovative designs like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which are more cost-effective and easier by design. The U.S., Canada, and some European countries are pushing these technologies as part of their clean energy transition. Or, like Sweden, making their main game.

    Yet the fossil fuel industry’s influence remains a formidable obstacle. Continued financial prioritisation of fossil fuels over Fission hampers progress and locks in higher emissions, the deaths they cause and energy insecurity risks for decades to come.

    Global Reflection: The Need for Transparency and Realignment

    Around the world, the fossil fuel industry’s strategic spend to suppress Fission energy is a costly shadow game with massive implications for climate, economy, and energy independence. Countries like Germany demonstrate the pain of energy policy skewed by fossil fuel lobbying, while Australia’s ballooning fossil fuel subsidies show the magnitude of public money fuelling this suppression.

    In 2025, as global clean energy investments reach unprecedented levels—over USD 2.2 trillion supporting renewables—the fossil fuel industry’s spending to maintain its grip on the market emphasises how much is at stake. If society is serious about combating climate change, improving energy security, and ensuring economic competitiveness, policymakers must address this imbalance and reconsider the obstacles fossil fuel interests have placed against Nuclear Fission Power.

    The truth behind Fission power’s stagnation is not one of technology limits or safety failures but of calculated financial power plays sustained by fossil fuels and their political allies. It’s a story worth knowing—and changing.

    Appendix: Country-by-Country Fossil Fuel Spending and Its Impact on Nuclear Energy Suppression in 2025

    This appendix complements the main report’s overarching analysis by providing granular data and examples that underscore the global nature of fossil fuel spending in nuclear energy suppression.

    These country-specific figures and contexts reveal the scale and diversity of fossil fuel industry support worldwide, illustrating how this financial leverage acts as a powerful brake on the development of safe, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy in 2025.

    United States

    • Annual fossil fuel subsidies exceed USD 20 billion, encompassing federal and state tax breaks and direct funding.
    • Disclosed fossil fuel industry lobbying surpasses USD 125 million each year, heavily influencing regulations that significantly increase nuclear plant construction costs and timelines.
    • Undisclosed fossil fuel support for suppressive activities is estimated to exceed USD 5 billion annually.
    • Regulatory frameworks such as the Linear No-Threshold radiation exposure model, instigated by fossil fuel interests, contribute billions in additional costs and delays for nuclear projects.
    • The combined effect creates a challenging environment for nuclear energy expansion despite its safety and clean energy benefits.

    Germany

    • The German government spent approximately 690 million euros in 2021 actively campaigning against French nuclear power, motivated by economic competition concerns as lower French electricity prices put German industries, especially automotive manufacturing, at a disadvantage. Germany routinely spends more than 500 million euros each year on programs against French Fission energy.
    • Fossil fuel subsidies and supports range between USD 15-USD 20 billion annually, primarily supporting coal and gas power plants during the energy transition.
    • These substantial political and financial efforts sustain high fossil fuel dependency and suppress domestic nuclear energy initiatives.

    Australia

    • Total fossil fuel subsidies from federal and state governments amounted to USD 14.9 billion in 2024–25, marking a 3% increase from the previous year.
    • The Federal Government’s Fuel Tax Credits Scheme is a significant contributor, valued at over USD 10 billion alone.
    • State-level spending includes substantial funding for coal mines, gas power stations, and related infrastructure, with Queensland and Western Australia being notable contributors.
    • Nuclear Fission power remains politically sidelined, with fossil fuel industry influence heavily steering energy policy.

    Canada

    • Fossil fuel subsidies are estimated between USD 10-13 billion annually, mainly through tax incentives and direct spending to support oil sands and pipeline infrastructure.
    • Fossil fuel industry revenues significantly shape regional energy policies, limiting nuclear energy’s expansion potential.

    China

    • China provides over USD 30 billion in annual fossil fuel subsidies, underpinning coal and natural gas as critical transition fuels despite aggressive nuclear development plans.
    • Political influence from state-owned fossil fuel enterprises delays broader nuclear adoption in some regions, balancing industrial and energy security concerns.

    India

    • Fossil fuel subsidies totalled approximately USD 40 billion in 2024, predominantly favouring coal and oil sectors.
    • Although nuclear power is considered a future energy option, the overwhelming fossil fuel dominance slows regulatory progress and investment in nuclear infrastructure.

    France

    • France represents a pro-nuclear exception with relatively low fossil fuel subsidies, below USD 5 billion annually.
    • France’s government-backed nuclear energy utilities have minimised fossil fuel influence, supporting a substantial portion of the country’s electricity without significant opposition.

    United Kingdom

    • Fossil fuel subsidies range between USD 8-10 billion annually, largely focusing on oil and gas industries in the North Sea.
    • The fossil fuel sector’s political clout contributes to regulatory challenges that inhibit the scaling up of nuclear power projects, despite official plans to expand nuclear capacity.

    References

    1. https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/how-g7-can-advance-action-fossil-fuel-subsidies-2025
    2. https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/P1669-Fossil-fuel-subsidies-2025-Web.pdf
    3. https://oilchange.org/fossil-fuel-subsidies/
    4. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-surveys-finland-2025_985d0555-en/full-report/stepping-up-the-transition-to-net-zero_902009f2.html
    5. https://ourworldindata.org/how-much-subsidies-fossil-fuels
    6. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/03_presentation%20by%20iea%20on%20energy%20investment%20trends.pdf
    7. https://www.germanwatch.org/en/91780
    8. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspects/energy-subsidies
    9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096703/

    Tags

    #CleanEnergyTransition #NuclearPowerNow #FossilFuelFree #EnergyPolicyReform #ClimateAction2025 #Nuclear #Energy

    Links

    Linkedin

    Patreon

  • Australia needs to adopt Thorium Molten Salt Technology for energy production

    Post by Jeremiah Josey. Content by Liz Penfold

    Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison

    “Technology, not taxes is the Australian Way to reduce emissions while protecting our economy and living standards.”
    Prime Minister Scott Morrison pledging Net Zero by 2050

    But Mr. Morrison, it’s not just about reducing CO2. It’s also about Australia being a world leader.

    China and Russia are building small modular reactors for themselves and for export to third world countries. They’re lowering their own carbon emissions and those in other countries, whilst reducing fossil fuel pollution that is killing millions particularly children under 5 years and also saving more lives by enabling desalination for clean drinking water and growing food.

    Australia exports uranium and coal and say we are good citizens, on the right track to the solution for global warming. We are not being good world citizens when we don’t look at the big picture but only our self-interest.

    Small, modular, transportable, Thorium molten salt burners could be this new technology that our Australian Government is relying on to create jobs, reduce carbon emissions and win the next election.

    “Small Modular Reactors are the Future. Since 1970, nuclear has saved 60,000 million tonnes of CO2 emissions. Nuclear could deliver net zero, if only it was allowed to. Nuclear power will also solve water supply problems in a scalable manner.” Paul Kristensen Western Australian Owner/Principle- PK Science Consulting, nuclear scientist, and advocate.

    Paul Kristensen Western Australian Owner/Principle- PK Science Consulting, nuclear scientist, and advocate

    CURRENTLY the Rare Earth Elements (REE) in our mineral sands, which contain Thorium and uranium, cannot be used due to provisions in the Australia’s Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. [AEP&BC Act] The Act is causing this potentially very valuable product to be disposed of as waste by unrecoverable burial.

    “Only Australia, a true laggard and outlier, holds nuclear energy as illegal. In this, Australia is not just eccentric, but nuts.”
    Greg Sheridan, Foreign Editor, The Weekend Australian 10/11 July 2021.

    Greg Sheridan, Foreign Editor, The Australian

    Thorium is now being researched by over 30 countries. China is already operating a prototype reactor and building a commercial reactor to supply energy for a desert city.

    Thorium molten salt burners can:-
    • provide safe, low-cost, carbon free, reliable base load energy replacing fossil fuels.
    • desalinate water for drinking and growing food.
    • use nuclear waste as fuel.
    • transport a reactor by truck or barge in a container to where needed.
    • produce much less waste which only needs storing for 300 years not thousands.
    • use a small earth footprint unlike solar, wind and hydro.
    • be rebooted after 60 years so do not have the expensive and difficult recycling of
    wind and solar.
    • be cooled without water so can be used in deserts.
    • not blow up or easily used to make bombs
    • be used to produce medical isotopes to save thousands of lives.

    “Technology will have the answers to a decarbonised economy, particularly over time.” Scott Morrison

    The Liberal goal is to create wealth and jobs in Australia and win the next elections both State and Federal in March 2022 and hopefully gain the respect of other countries.

    Mrs Liz Penfold
Former public representative for Flinders, South Australia
    Liz Penfold

    Authored by Mrs Liz Penfold
    Former public representative for Flinders, South Australia.
    Undefeated in office from 1993 until retirement in 2010, with an approval rating always above 70%.
    Adviser to The Thorium Network on Australian Political Affairs.
    Liz on Wikipedia; Liz on Linkedin

  • Minerals Council of Australia issues report on Small Modular Reactors – Molten Salt is featured

    Authored by Jeremiah Josey and the team at The Thorium Network

    Australia has committed to buying up to 8 small modular reactors*. It is conceivable to envisage similar technology rolling out across the country to produce SAFE, reliable, green energy. Thus, with a little imagination, one can envisage a burgeoning Thorium industry. And also eventual production of Safe clean fission energy from Molten Salt technologies. The imagination then expands further to the concept of a booming domestic vertical Rare Earths industry. With Boeing making UAVs in Toowoomba (Australia), how much of each aircraft could be supplied from ingenious, locally processed materials? Bringing it down to earth, how competitive would domestic EV and batteries industries become for export with local strategic supplies?

    The mind boggles.

    C’est la vie.

    *Technically, these small modular reactors have a capacity of about 200MWt. They will probably be “9th generation” and hence have millions of safe operating hours behind them. Whilst the basis of the AUSUK decision is incorrect, the opportunities for correction open immensely.

    Meanwhile, our consulting division, SAFE Fission Consult(TM), holds some of the brightest and experienced minds in the fission world. We are preparing countries for Safe Fission Energy:

    See the article here:

    https://www.minerals.org.au/news/small-modular-reactors-should-be-part-australia%E2%80%99s-energy-mix

    Full credit to Adelaide based Dr. Ben Heard of Frazer-Nash Consultancy for producing the report.

    The full report is here: